Showing posts with label cosleeping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cosleeping. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Discipline Before the Age of Reason

I recently read an article by the Popchaks on Catholic Exchange encouraging parents to parent with a Catholic worldview of self-donative love. He challenged parents to decide if their parenting looked different from that of people of other faiths with different worldviews.  I'm not a theologian by any means but I do believe that the Catholic view of sin and forgiveness and free will is different from that of say Evangelical Protestants.  I have been mulling that thought over and over in the mind and I keep coming back to the idea of the age of reason. So, I'm going to run with it and post my thoughts on discipline and parenting before the age of reason.   These are just my thoughts and what works for us.  I can't say how anyone else should parent and I'm definitely not a parenting expert by any means.  The only experience I have is with my own kids and how I was raised and it is quite possible that my kids are all relatively easy and generally tend to be fairly obedient and highly motivated by a desire to please us and God. At least so far.   Even the child that I thought was the most strong-willed (my second) has calmed down a lot and is now generally a very happy and obedient child.

The Catholic Church teaches that children reach the age of reason around seven years of age.  What does this mean?  The age of reason or age of discretion is meant to be the age at which a person becomes morally responsible.   It is the age at which most Catholic children receive their first Confession and First Holy Communion.   Of course some children reach it earlier, some later and some individuals with severe special needs may not reach it at all, but most kids start to have more of an awareness of sin around that age. 

Most parents know what the means when it comes attendance at Mass (it becomes an obligation) and reception of the Sacraments. 

But what does it mean when it comes to discipline?  Does it mean anything?

How do we discipline with the idea of the age of reason in mind?  After all, if discipline is about teaching right from wrong and the church teaches that children aren't morally responsible until they reach the age of reason, shouldn't that affect our discipline? Should our discipline for older children look different than that for younger ones?

If our children don't reach the age of reason until about age 7, does this basically mean that they can't sin until about that age?  I believe it does. I don't believe that our Church would allow little children to live in sin without giving them the grace of the Sacrament of Confession.  This doesn't mean that we don't expect good behavior from our younger children and that we don't teach them right from wrong.  We certainly do, and we have an obligation to do so, but we also need to keep in mind that young children are not morally responsible for their actions.

I may call my one-year old bad for scribbling in library books...but she's not being bad..not really.  We homeschool for crying out loud, so she's just imitating what she sees everyone else doing (lots of writing and drawing).  

A three-year old who hits his baby sister is not morally responsible for his actions.  We still need to teach him it's wrong..but he's not really capable of sin yet, not really.

A four-year old who lies doesn't have a real understanding that it's wrong and sinful.   Not that we can just let the lie go without addressing it, but we need to realize that she doesn't have a firm grasp of lying and that it's wrong. 

A five-year old who won't stay in bed may drive us to drink, but they aren't doing it on purpose and aren't necessarily being bad.  They may be exasperating, but they aren't really sinning. 

So, what does this all mean for how we discipline young children?  

Many years ago when my oldest was only two years of age she went through a hitting and grabbing phase...at playgroup, at La Leche League meetings, anyplace we were around other toddlers.  I was mortified and humiliated.   I even avoided playgroup for a time.  And, I observed how the other moms handled hitting with their young toddlers (three and under).  Some spanked for it.  Some (most) used time-out.   Some would leave the playgroup as a consequence for hitting.  None of the those options really sat right with me.  I had already decided that I wasn't going to spank...just didn't feel right to me.  Time-out didn't seem to work with other kids...they kept right on hitting/grabbing toys and I wasn't sure that my 2-year old really had the comprehension for that.  In fact, she was diagnosed with global developmental delay as a child, so when she was two, in many ways, developmentally she was only about one (by about age 6 or so, she was all caught up developmentally).  And, leaving seemed like the worst option, because 1) it would be punishing ME more than her,  I actually attended playgroup more for ME (for the social interaction with other moms) and 2) I definitely didn't think she had the comprehension (remember she was delayed) to connect leaving with her previous action...especially since leaving always takes a few minutes (gathering up coats and diaper bags,  saying our good-bye's, etc.).

What I ended up doing was just keeping a close eye on her and quickly intervening if she grabbed toys or hit.   If the grabbed toys, I returned the toy to the previous holder of it and if she hit, I just gently grabbed her hand to prevent her from hitting and said "no hitting, be gentle"  So, while we taught her not to hit, we didn't really punish her for it. 

Eventually she got it and stopped hitting or grabbing toys.  In fact when she was a bit older (around 5 or 6) and I would tell people about how she used to hit, they were so surprised because she was always very sweet and happy and easy to get along with.  And she still is at age 11 (almost 12).  Not punishing her for hitting at age 2 did not turn into a violent, aggressive kid when she was older.  In fact, once she got past the hitting phase (by 3 1/2 which was more like 2 1/2 developmentally for her) she never really did it again. 

So how do we discipline young children?  Well in all things, we strive for gentleness and patience.  We fail on this every singe day and I still yell way too frequently but the goal is patience and gentleness while still teaching important lessons.  I try to avoid punishment of young children who don't know better.  By punishment I mean a parent imposed consequence that is totally unrelated to the "crime".  We do use logical consequences.  Our day has a natural rhythm and routine...for example every night before bed everyone is allowed to watch a show on Netflix.  However, before they can do that they need to clean the whole house...all toys and books picked up, floors swept/etc.  If it takes them too long to clean, they won't have time to watch or will have less time to watch before bed.  If they can't take care of an item or use it safely, it gets taken away.   If they can't get along with their siblings, they get separated.   If they don't pick up their toys or books, they can't do the next thing, whatever that thing may be reading stories or watching a show or eating a snack or going outside.

We also make use of routines and doing something the same way EVERY single time, and that seems to make a big difference.  For example, they get immediately buckled into their carseat as soon as we get into the car.  And, we NEVER buy anything in the store just because they ask for it, so they learn just not to ask.  They don't fight getting dressed because they are always dressed...we don't let them run around naked. It just makes things easier, if they are used to always wearing clothes, they don't fight wearing clothes. 

For the most part our young kids listen to verbal direction very well...and if they don't, we will make them do what we ask.  Not make as in punish or coerce them into doing it, but make as in physically make them do it.  As I was writing this, I saw our little 15-month old start to climb on a crate of books underneath the bookshelf across the room.  I said to her "No, no baby, no climbing the books, get down,"   And, she paused, she looked at me....I looked at her.  We had about a 30 second stare-off before she got down and ran over to me.   And, that was it.  If she hadn't gotten down, then I would have gotten up and physically lifted her down (making her get down), and told her again "no climbing the books" and that would have been it.    Because when kids are little, you can do that.   If they run in the street, they get physically picked up and taken out of the street and told "no."  If they fight getting into the car seat, well they get wrangled into it anyway.  If they resist leaving the park, they get picked up and gently carried out anyway.  If they throw food on the ground, they get told "no throwing food, give it to me " and I give them a plate to put the unwanted food on.   No further punishment needed.   Believe it or not, this works and they learn what is expected of them. When they're little, you can do that and by the time they are too big for that, they are old enough to listen to reason or logic and don't do those behaviors any more. It is all about teaching them what we expect of them while still realizing that they don't yet have the cognitive abilities to be morally responsible for their actions.

If our young children temper tantrum, we hold and comfort them through it.  After all, I have a hard enough time controlling my temper sometimes (which is why I yell way too much), so it's seems rather unreasonable to expect a 3-year old to have perfect control of her emotions, when I'm in my mid-30's and still don't.   In my experience with my kids, separating them when they scream and cry (into "time-out") just makes them scream and cry louder, while holding and them and comforting them through the tantrum ends it much quicker.

If a 4-year old gets out of bed or refuses to stay in bed,  we lie down with or stay with them for a few minutes to help them relax and fall asleep.  Because sometimes it's hard to fall asleep alone and sometimes they're scared of the dark and that's okay when they're four, because you know what....they outgrow it.  And, it actually takes less time (usually less than 15 minutes) to just lie with a young child and help them fall asleep than it does to repeatedly put them back into their room.  Plus, by three and four all my kids were done napping, so by nighttime they were TIRED and fell asleep within minutes.

We also try to look for other causes of misbehavior (tiredness, hunger, loneliness, not getting enough attention) and address those.  My 5-year old son has a tendency to act out sometimes when he is feeling neglected.  I know this.  He unfortunately tends to get lost in the shuffle, because I give the toddler a lot of attention and time (because she needs it).  I give the older girls more attention and time, because we are homeschooling and well...sixth grade trumps kindergarten when it comes doing work.  So, usually taking the time to do school with him and read him a story makes a big difference in his behavior and he does less "pestering, attention-seeking" behavior after that.  Building that connection seems to be key and in some ways it mimics what the church does in Confession.  When I go to Confession, 100% of the time, the penance involves prayer...it is meant to bring me back to God. I can't remember ever actually being given a real "punishment" in Confession...just lots of prayers and occasionally good deeds that are meant to bring me closer to God and to others.  So, we try to discipline and parent always striving to build that connection and repair any broken connections.

This is how we do things (or at least strive to do things...we fail, frequently).  I'm not saying it's the ONLY way to do things or even necessarily the RIGHT way to do things, but it is the way that feels most right to us and is part of our general parenting practices (co-sleeping, breastfeeding into the toddler years, not doing "cry-it out").  I'm not sure if those parenting practices make it "easier", but it is "easier" for me, because it comes most naturally to me.

{Linking up with Mama Moments Monday (on Tuesday)}

post signature

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Why we've stuck with attachment parenting

I just love Facebook. Seriously..I love it...I get exposed to so many blogs and ideas and links...and since I have carefully selected my "likes" to correspond with my interests, a lot of interesting articles show up.

This morning, an article entitled: Why we ditched attachment parenting showed up in my newsfeed.  So, I said to myself, Hmmm, that looks interesting, I think I can waste a few moments of my life reading that.  So, I did..because I love reading blogs and wasting time.

While the author was careful to state that different parenting styles work for different parents, she also seemed to say that co-sleeping turned her son (and lots of other children she knew) into a clingy, sleep-deprived mess, while her sleep-trained daughter was happy and content and slept well and everything was all rainbows and butterflies.   And, while I have no doubt that is true for her, I don't by any means think  it is a universal experience.

I think the real issue here is that new parents can get so caught up in parenting "styles" or labels, that they lose sight of the real focus and don't just do what works.   While we follow many of the "tenets" of attachment parenting,  I don't  consider us hard-core followers of any parenting style.

Love my Kozy!  I think it is my favorite baby carrier!


I'm all about baby-wearing..I have a too big, nice little collection of slings...everything from ring-slings to mei tais, to pouches (never could get into wraps though), but Elsa still spends plenty of time in a stroller, or the exersaucer or bouncy chair  or just on the floor.  Floor time is becoming limited though because Miss Grabby Hands has this amazing ability to reach and grab things that I could have sworn were out of reach when I put her down.   She doesn't crawl yet..she just sort of wiggles and stretches and somehow manages to grab things and the next thing I know, I'm all, Aaack, the baby is chewing on the computer cord,  and then I have to take it away from her, and well..she's not too fond of that.  I need to get the kids to keep the floor better picked up with their toys, because most of the time, it's one big, baby booby trap.

The baby in this picture is Heidi.  And, I have no idea why there is no sheet on that mattress??  This picture was taken in RI, while we were on vacation one summer, visiting my family.
And, yes, we do co-sleep and yes, she does *have* to nurse to fall asleep, and yes *all* my kids did that as babies and none of the older ones do that now.  They all fall asleep on their own, just fine, in their own room, and you can't even tell that when they were babies they had to nurse to sleep.  It's true..they do all eventually wean and potty-train and move into their own bed...and it even happened before kindergarten!

Yes, my not-quite 6-month old still nurses during the night...but. really..it's super easy when she's in bed with me.  I just latch her on real quick and go right back to sleep.  Hardly any sleep disturbance at all.  And, lately she's been giving us a good chunk of time when she first falls asleep for the night, where she sleeps alone in bed..which is wonderful.  And, all my kids did that as babies..they'd fall asleep around 8:00 or so and give us about 2 hours where they slept alone, before waking up around 10:00 ish..which is when I go to bed anyway.

Now, you may remember that last Friday, I posted about how I was sleep-deprived and tired, due to Elsa.  But, that wasn't totally true (ok..I admit it..I sorta lied... I better go to Confession now).  The reason I was sleep-deprived wasn't so much that Elsa was keeping me up, but that *I* had stayed up too late a few nights that week (and especially the night before), and it had caught up with me.  Yes, Elsa does wake up to nurse, but the real reason I was so tired was that I hadn't gone to bed early enough the night before or a few previous nights that week as well. Ever since I was a kid, I have had an inability to "sleep-in".  I'm totally wired to be a morning person, so when the sun starts peeking through the shades, I wake up..and can no longer sleep. Which means, that I can't make up lost sleep from the night before, by sleeping later.

Which brings me to my next point..the reason I was so sleep-deprived last week.  It's because the night before I had gone to a fun Mom's Night Out with friends...with baby in tow.  And, it was totally fine.  I held her some, a friend held her some (and showed her off to the snowbirds at the next table) and eventually she nursed and nodded off and I just held her in my arms while chatting with my friends, relaxing, and having a great time NOT being at home, while my wonderful husband dealt with the older kids and put them to bed and all that.  You see, having a baby that always nurses to sleep does mean that *I* always have to nurse her to sleep,  but it also means that she is totally and completely flexible and portable.  She will fall asleep anywhere..we don't have to worry about cranky baby while out, or having to take her home so she can nap.  Saturday night, we were also out with her past her bedtime...(at a wonderful friend's house for a lovely First Saturday Rosary and social time) and she was passed around and held by lots of friends, and then when she got tired, I just nursed her and she fell asleep and was still passed around while asleep. Lately, it's worked out that Sunday Mass happens to fall during the time she would nap, so I just nurse her in the pew, she falls asleep and we just hold her for the duration of Mass, and all is well.

You see, I value social time, and outings and getting out of the house and being with friends.  It would drive me CRAZY, to have to schedule my life or our outings around a baby's nap or bedtime.  Seriously crazy.  With 3 older homeschooling kids, I need to be able to take them to activities or coops or field trips without worrying about a baby's nap.

The one time she slept in a crib..I think it lasted about 10 minutes.
I totally realize that a different parenting style works better for other parents..and for some families, the baby always sleeps in crib, lifestyle works for them.  However, that type of life would not work for me.  I would much rather baby was dependent on *me* for nursing and sleeping and just drag them along wherever I go, than have to schedule around feedings or naps or get babysitters (because heaven knows, babysitters are NOT in our budget).  This is what works for us.  And, that totally dependent stage does not last forever.  My baby will be 6 months old next week...and honestly it feels like she was just born yesterday.  I know, that before I even know it, she'll be even more independent.

I don't follow attachment parenting because I think it is "better"..but because for the most part, it is what works for our family.  And, I think really..that is what parenting is all about.  It is about finding what works for each family and baby.  So, for some families, co-sleeping may be an absolute disaster and lead to sleep-deprived parents and babies, while for others, it may be blissful and lead to happy parents and babies.  It's all about finding what works, and then letting go of labels and styles and preconceived notions.

post signature

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...